SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Disk Drive Sector Discussion Forum
WDC 139.09-0.8%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stitch who wrote (4751)10/17/1998 12:31:00 AM
From: La Traguhs  Read Replies (1) of 9256
 
Hi Stitch,

You "outloud" comments are surely thought provoking. So I got provoked and came up with my thoughts.

I think Seagate has to swim with the areal density flow or sink. It appears that the entry capacity point on the sub $100 OEM drive has moved from 2.1 GB to 4 GB. With the areal density march going forward (still irregardless of the what the market really needs), the box builders can now get 4 GB in one platter/two heads versus six months ago where we were talking 2.1 GB for one/platter two heads at about the same price point. Naturally, they'll push for the 4 GB capacity.

Ya gotta remember that the playing field is starting to become leveled. We're at one platter/two heads for the low end market - not far from the asymptote of one platter/one head. (This, my sources say, for 3-4 GB capacity will occur mid to end next year). My guess is, when that happens, the guy with most efficient vertical model wins and that could be Seagate - if they stay in the race.

Yah know, I know they're pushing to stay in the time-to-market desktop race, but their poor execution towards that objective speaks to a lack of stomach for the segment.

Regards,
LT
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext