SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 101.44+3.5%Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: EyeDrMike who wrote (21870)10/17/1998 8:54:00 PM
From: PaulM  Read Replies (1) of 116756
 
EyeDrMike,

re: M1, M2 and M3 I'm no expert. I do know that these are three measures of the money supply, each progressively less liquid starting with M1, the most liquid.

M1 is the total amount of U.S. currency and checking account deposits in the country--in the US.

M2 is M1 plus some other things. The total amount in savings accounts for instance. Generally, money not as easily accessible as M1.

M3 is the broadest measure of the money supply. Its is M2 plus some other things. Generally, total amount of money even less accessible than M2 (e.g., money tied up in a CD or something of the sort). The exact components of M1, M2 and M3 are in the fine print in the Fed link I posted.

Neither M1, M2 or M3 include money floating around outside the U.S.
So what the Fed report shows is the domestic anual rate of increase of these money supply measures over various time periods (e.g., last three months).

As I mentioned in my earlier post, M1 decreasing relative to M2 and M3 does not suggest a "liquidity crisis" because liquidity crises have traditionally boosted demand for M1--hard, immediately spendable currency--relative to less accessible measures of the money supply.

All that is my understanding anyway.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext