SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (10030)10/18/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (4) of 67261
 
Dwight Dwight Dwight. Here we go again. Sheesh same old same old. At least I try to dig up something original with the Giraffe decimation issue.

When you proclaimed that "there is no life there, period" in fetuses, I put forth the fetal
brainwaves and fetal heart-beat, and the fact that fetuses kick their legs.

You had no response. A week later and I see you again posting pro-abortion comments.

Dwight, just because there is a fetal heart beat, does not mean a 2 mos old fetus is sustainable life. If you are disputing that there is indeed life (verb) there, I suppose I agree. Just like your foot or hair is life... but it is not a life (noun). A 2 mos old fetus is an extension of a womans body that if allowed to come to term, will be sustainable life. But at 2 or 3 mos, imo there is no difference between what is there and any other part of the mothers body...and thats why I think the mother should be able to make a decision as to what to do with her own body.

The RR is just going to have to understand that just because your Bible says something is sacred (in this case a 2 mos old fetus), that doesnt mean it is sacred for all those non-Christians in the country that are the majority. I have no idea how the Buddhist majority around here see this issue but I doubt it completely mirrors the opinion of the RR. Example how would you feel if veegetarianism was imposed upon you because a certain majority indian culture believes cows are sacred?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News