This antitrust case is funny. NSCP claimed that if MSFT control the majority of the Browser market, the web site developer will have to deal with Microsoft in the future.
I remember , just before MSFT came to the Browser business, NSCP controled almost 100% of the browser market, and NSCP did not have any problem that
based on NSCP's almost 100% of the market share then almost all web site developer will have to deal with NSCP. Now, MSFT had 60% of the Browser market, and NSCP had 40%, NSCP started to cry to the DOJ that if MSFT control the majority of the Browser market, all web site developer will have to deal with MSFT in the future, and that is not good. SO, NSCP's wants to control the majority of the browser market,
any company else control the browser market will be not good for the web site developers. Only NSCP's control of the browser market will be good for the
web site developer , based on NSCP's logic. NSCP is not satisfied with the current market share distribution that MSFT has 60%, NSCP 40%. NSCP wants 100%, so , DOJ is helping NSCP to reach that goal.
|
