SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stitch who wrote (7204)10/19/1998 2:46:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar  Read Replies (1) of 9980
 
The interesting characteristic of Stratford's analysis to me, was the lack of mixing in the Chinese aspect in the bilateral tension surrounding Japan vs US solutions to the Asian banking/trade crisis. As far as it goes I think Stratford has defined the positions of the the US and Japan quite precisely and succinctly, but it cannot be taken out of context in the real world and analyzed and understood in total. There is and has always been a struggle between Japan and China within the Asian context. The economic regionalization theme as well is missing or lightly glossed. But then the Russian/Japan aspect is also a factor, and will influence Japan in the years to come. As of course the US/Russian and the Western/Eastern European contacts influence the Russian side as well. A complicated web of interconnectedness we seem to have spun.

One must also not forget the MiddleEast with its oil factor, or India and the subcontinent of Asia for that matter. N-dimensional problem solving, anyone ?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News