Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (39631)	10/19/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: Investor A	Read Replies (2) of 1578900

I'll bet that in theory, a K6 without an L2 cache on the motherboard, running at 266 MHz on a 66 MHz bus, will be slower than a Celeron 266 without L2 cache, even more so when running Windows NT and 100% 32-bit code. So much for the "superior" K6. Tenchusatsu Why are you so cheap not to make tests by yourself before you placed a bet on the inferior PII? At least, you should try a research before you bet. anandtech.com Without L2 cache, PII vs K6 is 41.9 51.6

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next