Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Yousef who wrote (39626)	10/20/1998 6:11:00 AM
From: Kenith Lee	Read Replies (2) of 1578515

I think that AMD has continued to "tweak" their .25um process with poly gate linewidth shrinks. At a 2.1V -> 2.2V operating supply, AMD might be running .24um -> .22um at the poly level. I don't know whether this will get them to 400mhz ... my guess is it will, but there could be speed bin yield problems if the process "drifts" at all. It looks like Intel really kept you out of their best stuffs? FYI, Intel's 0.25um 333Mhz P-II has an average gate length of 180nm. If AMD can get 400 with 220nm as you had suggested, how fast will K6 be? Let's see: If K6 at 220nm gate gets 400mhz vs. P-II at 180nm gets 333mhz How can Intel be 2 years ahead in process technology? -KL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next