SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (39658)10/20/1998 9:35:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) of 1578938
 
Ten, <Every CPU benchmark shows that the P6 is superior to the K6 in integer instructions... the K6 wasn't as efficient as the P6 in integer execution. the K6 practically needs a larger L1 cache because of its lack of backside L2 cache.>
Wrong statements. Too generic. K6 lacks NOTHING. It is
Intel's north bridge that has a cheap "lookaside" L2
cache architecture and lacks an independent memory bus.
It is a matter of Intel's system implementation, cheap
implementation.
It has very little to do with K6 internal merits.
K6 beats P-II on every benchmark at low core
frequencies, where the "Intel architecture" P5-class
memory subsystem become more balanced with K6 core
capabilities (relative memory latencies become
smaller).

You forgot the simple fact that AMD had no resources
to change the P5-Intel-dominated infrastructure of the
whole PC industry, and has to play within the P5 rules.

<but you're not going to convince people who know
a little better.> I'm sorry, but it is certainly
not you. Brian's argument about cacheless Celeron
is perfectly valid.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext