Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jpbrody who wrote (16822)	10/20/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Very interesting take on the patent situation. Thanks. I don't have access to the pleadings, so I don't know what claims have actually been dismissed. It sounds like Ericy has to dismiss its claims on the old patent and bring new ones on the "added to." Wouldn't this delay everything, since the patent office will take some time to approve or disapprove of the amendment? It sounds like, on the surface, you should be correct that "starting" over has a plus but a big minus--certainly for any other type of case, but patent suits are a special animal. Could be a delaying tactic to buy more time, cloud the issues in the suit; could strengthen Ericy case, but only in time. Thanks again, for your enlightening thoughts.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next