STRONGER than ever. go DCTC!
WISDOM....er, I mean Wisdom,
OT-Thoughts at large at 1:00 AM CST.
I do agree with your final above statement, but I felt my inner child needed to say something about the rest of your post.
You also stated: IN some cases HUSBAND don't really
know WIFE even if they are together for 20years.
I'm sure this statement has enlightened all of us who are or have been married for any length of time. In fact, my dad just commented about my mother, "I don't know what the hell that woman wants..." and they've been married 50 years! Therefore, I say your conspicuous observation is well founded.
As for the majority of your statement, I feel what you're saying is the identity of one's existence is really superfluous to the quest for truth, even though said identity is obscured or fully hidden in this pursuit no matter how surreptitious the clandestine nature of said identity/non identity is supported by the ostensible veracity of what may or may not being said being traceable to an email address using one's best judgement regardless of Netscape or Explorer.
After all, Don Quixote never knew the names of the windmills and (I'll just bet) even Deepak Chopra hides a little in his own mantra now and then.
Of course, this loses a bit of panache if you state this when you're not wearing pants while eating Italian food. In fact, the whole postulation falls flat on its face if the postulator uses it in any hybrid application of Wayne Dyer's theory on hair restoration.
You also wrote: who I am is not important. I don't think I am somebody.
To this I quote an old Dean Martin lyric (recently made presidential) which is really a non sequiteur but this is my post: "Everybody loves somebody sometime."
What I'm trying to say here is that because of your anonymity, I feel I may have wrongly inferred you of not being a credible poster...>;-]
Onward DCTC!
George
BTW-Just out of curiosity, who are you? <G> |
