NeuroStock Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : NeuroStock

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Optim who wrote (260)	10/21/1998 5:55:00 PM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (2) of 805

Optim, "I have also found that 1 year might be a little short for some issues. I have started to experiment with this also, and am finding a sweet spot of 1 1/2 to 2 years on most issues. I think I might have lucked out on the first few." FWIW, I took one stock that I had a good net for, "forgot" all the previous training and retrained it with 1, 2 and 3 years of training data. The 3 year version trained much faster. Has anyone else tried this? What did you find? I don't really see a downside to using 3 (or more) years of training data. That should, in theory, expose the net to the most variety of conditions. Hopefully, then it won't be surprised by changes in trading patterns. Comments?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next