SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (10650)10/22/1998 1:53:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
I have said numerous times that if the Starr investigation were about Clinton's campaign finances, his real estate dealings, or his illegal procurement of FBI files, I would wholeheartedly jump on the dump Clinton bandwagon. Unfortunately they are about his morals.

You evidently haven't read the Starr report. Nowhere in there is "his morals" listed as one the 12 or so "impeachable offenses". So enough of that nonsense. Clinton's Waterloo is perjury, which is a felony. And our Constitution says than felons may not serve as Presidents. Lest you say "yes but it's just sex-lies": Nowhere in law or in legal precedent, that I have seen cited, has there been an "exception" for perjury "when it's about sex". Particularly when the case in question, P.J. vs. Clinton, was a case about sexual harassment.

To excuse a felony, or not to excuse a felony, that is the question.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News