A predictable and hollow moral relativist response. Character does matter. Letting Clinton get away with his lies, perjury, obstruction and abuse of his office will corrupt an entire generation. NO MAN is above the law. Especially not one who is so lacking in character as the current occupant of the WH. If that be "McCarthyite" then that is a label I will gladly wear. It is time to return character and integrity to our lives and to politics in this country. Clinton is hopefully the nadir. It is spineless relativists such as yourself, fearful that someone may criticize your own lifestyle who have given a pass to the likes of Clinton for too long. You sir are a willing accomplice to the decline and (soon to be)fall of our society. Those who do not learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. It is exactly the collapse of moral order such as we are witnessing today which led to the leftist dictatorships in Europe in the 1930's and ultimately to WWII. I fear for a country and a society which do not recognize how corrosive the likes of Clinton are to all of us in our daily lives. Have you no shame? How can you continue to defend such an utterly despicable character? The fact that you seem educated and well read makes the situation all the more critical IMO. It is a very depressing situation indeed. JLA Message 5849957
Jeez, it sure sounds like you're blaming Clinton for the decline of the west to me. Oh, I get it, it's not Clinton that's responsible, it's anyone that doesn't share the right-thinking hatred of him that's preached early and often here. How about this guy?
"I thought from day one, as I think today, that this was bad for the country," said one of Starr's defenders who now questions his tactics. "Sometimes you have to exercise prosecutorial discretion." Even though this defender of Starr said he believed the president was guilty of significant misconduct, he said, "the cost to the country far outweighs the value of proving it." (from nytimes.com;
Is he a pompous idiot too, JLA? As opposed to Mr. Pilch, whose moral crusade you've chosen to defend: Message 6113649
I believe no good and decent parent or citizen would teach his/her children that this illness is acceptable, as its acceptance implies more than the destruction of an individual's life. It also implies the destruction of society.
So, we better ship 'em off to the concentration camps, eh? A certain irony there, if not for you, at least for the Jewish publishers of that last little defense of such righteously moral "Christian" thought. But then, you brought in Hitler above too, so I'd assume you're immune to this particular irony. |
