Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10785)	10/22/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Daniel - Personally, I don't agree with the absolutism that "life" as we know it begins at the exact moment of conception. I don't believe there is one accurately definable point - every pregnancy and every fetus is developmentally a work in progress, and when that work is deemed viable (by God, I believe) life is assured for it. Now, if you want to run the risk of making the decision vs. when God makes that decision, be my guest - legally you currently have the right to do that. For me, the closer to conception date, the better, because I don't believe God would condemn a spirit to a potentially inviable fetus. Nor do I believe you are accurately representing the position of the pro-life side of the issue. You are conveniently using the position of the furthest fringe in an attempt to stereotype the majority of those who are far from the fringe. What is your motive in doing that? Fear mongering, perhaps? Mr. K.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next