SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MDHM-A Junior Gold Mining Company With Great Potential

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Gold who wrote ()10/22/1998 5:49:00 PM
From: Coz   of 116
 
Transcript of Medinah's INTERNET lawsuit
____________________________________________________________

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE

MEDINAH ENERGY, INC., a
Nevada corporation;

Plaintiff,

vs. COMPLAINT

STAGGERL.EE, a trade name
for DOE 1 and/or BLACK
CORPORATION 1; DOES 2-5;
BLACK CORPORATIONS 2-5;

Defendants.
___________________________/

COMES NOW Plaintiff and as and for a Complaint against

Defendants, alleges as follows:

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

1. Plaintiff Medinah energy, Inc. is a corporation duly

organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of

Nevada which, at all times pertinent hereto, conducted business

in Washoe County, Nevada.

2. Defendant Staggerl.ee is an individual or business

entity currently unidentified to Plaintiff and, therefore,

Plaintiff names herein as Defendants Doe 1 and/or Black

Corporation 1. At all times pertinent hereto, said Defendant

conducted business in Washoe County, Nevada through Internet

communications.

3. Plaintiff does not know the true names or capacities of

the Defendants sued herein as DOES 2-5 and BLACK CORPORATIONS 2-

5. Therefore Plaintiff sues said Defendants by fictitious

names. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and therefore,

alleges, that each of said Defendants is legally responsible for

herein, and caused damages to Plaintiff, as alleged herein.

Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to insert the true name of

Defendant Staggerl.ee/Doe 1/ Black Corporation 1 when the name is

ascertained.

4. At all times pertinent hereto, certain Defendants were

the agents and/or employees of certain Co-Defendants and, in

doing the things hereinafter alleged, were acting within the

course and scope of each agency and/or employment and with the

permission and consent of such Co-Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as more particularly

hereinafter set forth.

//

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

5. Plaintiff realleges the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1-4 hereof as though fully set forth herein.

6. On Thursday, July 30, 1998, at 7:44 a.m., Eastern Time,

Staggerl.ee published false and defamatory information concerning

Plaintiff through Internet communication to, among other, Mike

Kovalchick. The Internet communication was directed to all users

of the Internet throughout the world.

7. In the defamatory information, Staggerl.ee stated in

bold type on the Internet that Plaintiff had “NO ASSETS”; had “NO

OPERATIONS”; was an “INTERNET SCAM”; and “IS A VACANT SHELL”.

8. Said comments were defamatory per se in that they

inputed to plaintiff and its management dishonesty and fraudulent

conduct.

9. Said comments were understood by third persons to be

defamatory and proximately caused damages to Plaintiff.

10. As a direct and proximate result of such defamation,

Plaintiff has suffered general damages in an amount in excess of

$10,000.

11. As a further direct and proximate result of such

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred special damages in a sum which

has not yet been fully determined. Plaintiff will seek leave to

amend this Complaint to conform to proof at the time of trial.

12. The conduct of Defendants was willful, wanton and

malicious and Plaintiff is, thereby, entitled to an award of

punitive damages in a sum in excess of $10,000 from each

Defendant.

13. As a further direct and proximate result of the above-

described conduct by Defendants, and each of the, Plaintiff was

required to employ the services of an attorney to prosecute this

action and is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees, coasts and

expenses incurred herein.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as fore particularly

hereinafter set forth.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

14. Plaintiff realleges the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1-13 hereof as though fully set forth herein.

15. The conduct of Defendants constituted intentional

and/or negligent interference with contractual relations of

Plaintiff.

16. As a direct and proximate result of said fraudulent

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred general damages in a sum in

excess of $10,000.

17. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants'

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred special damages in a sum which

has not yet been fully determined. Plaintiff will seek leave to

amend this Complaint to conform TO PROOF AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.

18. The conduct of Defendants was willful, wanton and

malicious and Plaintiff is, thereby, entitled to an award of

punitive damages in a sum in excess of $ 10,000 from each

Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as more particularly

hereinafter set forth.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

19. Plaintiff realleges the allegations contained in

paragraph 1-18 hereof as though fully set forth herein.

20. The conduct of Defendants constitutes intentional

and/or negligent interference with prospective economic

advantages to be realized by Plaintiff in its business

operations.

21. As a direct and proximate result of said fraudulent

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred general damages in a sum in

excess of 10,000.

22. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants'

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred special damages in a sum which

has not yet been fully determined. Plaintiff will seek leave to

amend this Complaint to conform to proof at the time of trial.

23. The conduct of Defendants was willful, wanton and

malicious and Plaintiff is, thereby, entitled to an award of

punitive damages in a sum in excess of $10,000 from each

Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as more particularly

hereinafter set forth.

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

24. Plaintiff realleges the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1-23 hereof as though fully set forth herein.

25. The conduct of Defendants constitutes a tort of

outrage.

26. As a direct and proximate result of said conduct,

Plaintiff has incurred general damages in a sum in excess of

$10,000.

27. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants'

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred special damages in a sum which

has not yet been fully determined. Plaintiff will seek leave to

amend this Complaint to conform to proof at the time of trial.

28. The conduct of Defendants was willful, wanton and

malicious and Plaintiff is, thereby, entitled to an award of

punitive damages in a sum in excess of $10,000 from each

Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as more particularly

hereinafter set forth.

//

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

29. Plaintiff realleges the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1-28 hereof as though fully set forth herein.

30. Upon information and belief, Defendant Doe 1 and/or

Black Corporation 1 entered into an agreement to commit, and in

furtherance thereof, did commit the acts set forth herein above.

Said conduct constitutes a conspiracy.

31. As a direct and proximate result of said conduct,

Plaintiff has incurred general damages in a sum in excess of

$10,000.

32. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants'

conduct, Plaintiff has incurred special damages in a sum which

has not yet been fully determined. Plaintiff will seek leave to

amend this Complaint to conform to proof at the time of trial.

33. The conduct of Defendants was willful, wanton and

malicious and Plaintiff is, thereby, entitled to an award of

punitive damages in a sum in excess of $10,000 from each

Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as more particularly

hereinafter set forth.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants,

and each of them as follows:

1. For judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against

Defendants, and each of them, on all claims set forth herein.

2. For general damages in favor of Plaintiff in a sum in

excess of $10,000 from each Defendant.

3. For special damages according to proof at the time of

trial. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to conform to proof

at the time of trial.

4. For punitive damages in favor of Plaintiff in a sum in

excess of $10,000 from each Defendant.

5. For attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred

herein.

6. For such other and further relief as the Court deems

just and proper.

Dated this 19th day of October, 1998

___________________________
Michael J. Morrison, Esq.,
Attorney for Plaintiff

_________________________________________________________________

REF: Message 6117919
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext