SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Montello Resources
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ned Land who wrote (2688)10/23/1998 11:53:00 PM
From: JP  Read Replies (1) of 4256
 
<<Because they both have the same chance of finding a mine and, as such, MEO is less expensive. That's why.>>

I don't know how you can say this Ned. I like Montello and I am gambling on them etc. etc. But- ACA has 20 some odd pipes -80% of which are diamondiferous. MEO probably has thirty pipes and hopefully has lots of diamonds as well but I can not say that 80% of MEO's pipes are diamondiferous, or have any diamonds at all for that matter. Until MEO proves up diamonds in their pipes -the odds are much better for ACA to have a mine than MEO. This is why I have PUG shares as well as MEO. If ACA goes, it will take PUG with it and I can make enough on PUG to cover the cost of my Montello. If PUG / ACA does nothing- the reverse could be true. ie -I think I have my ADP eggs in two baskets in case one drops. Hopefully they all hatch. :) JP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News