SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (11046)10/24/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
Re: Homosexuality, School Children, and the "At Risk" Concept

This is not my territory <gg>, but let me put a toe into the water with a few considerations.

1) It seems to be true that in hot-house same-sex environments, basically heterosexual children, as well as adults, will experiment with homosexual behaviors. For adults, cases in point: prisons; the merchant marine (yes, everybody). For children: Spartan training camps; English public schools (i.e., private boarding schools). In the case of the English public schools, this "homosexual behavior" was not all overt, but there was a lot of "falling in love". And it did not generally endure when the boys emerged into the normal adult world.

The conclusion that suggests itself: if you segregate adolescent males from what would be the normal objects of their awakened sex drive -- that is, females; and if you insist on herding them all together in a pressurized, round-the-clock environment, they are likely to turn to one another for "love". (Heck, some adolescent boys would turn to a tree, if there was nothing else available...) No "propaganda" is necessary here.

2) In American schools, boys who "seem" gay (and maybe are) are often unmercifully teased as "faggots", etc. Their lives are made absolutely miserable by their classmates. "Masculine-seeming" girls have an easier time of it, but they do not escape this kind of harassment altogether.

It seems to me that teachers have an absolute obligation to stop this vicious teasing (as they would stop teasing based on race, religion, or anything else). They cannot do that without teaching the children to "accept" homosexuality, in the sense of tolerating it in their classmates. No way is that the same thing as teaching them to adopt it. Besides, a normal heterosexual adolescent will not generally look to a member of the same sex for sexual satisfaction, if a member of the opposite sex is available.

3) Homosexual teachers as pedophiles. Again, I would suggest this is a danger only in same-sex environments. In general, there seem to be more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual ones. And it is my understanding that outright child molesters will molest any child, regardless of sex.

jbe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext