SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jbe who wrote (11089)10/24/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
<<Would you go along with this refinement of your question?>>

Some of it...

<<1) I might not accept something for myself (e.g., adultery), but would not demand that others follow my example.>>

How about the ladies who attend conferences with your husband? How about the ladies who attend conferences with your Mother's, sister's cousin's, best friend's husband? If you draw the line here, why are you so uncaring about the decent women's husbands, you've not met?

<<2) On the other hand, I might refuse to accept something (e.g., robbery) and insist that others also refuse to accept it.>>

So, for the man who has no money and steals a jar of milk for his starving near death baby, you become an absolutist? Never mind that's your number 3. We agree here.

So it's just sex that you can't take a stand on.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext