Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.32

+2.3%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (17115)	10/25/1998 4:26:00 AM
From: Raymond	Read Replies (4) of 152472

Maurice! No way Ericsson will buy QCOM.This is probably the last company they would buy.QCOM and the people working there hates Ericsson.It looks like people working for QCOM gets time off from work to write anti Ericsson pamflets on this and other forums. I don't think QCOM and Ericsson will mix very well because of that. It's interesting how this IPR discussion has developed.Now Ericsson has no right to their IPR:s on soft handoff because the solution is obvious.I can say the same thing about for QCOM:s method of doing power regulation for example.You don't need to be a Nobel prize winner to come up with that method for the closed loop power regualtion..They just happened to be the first company to license it in a CDMA system.Power regulation as such is used in many other cellular systems for example GSM Gregg said that a company wanting to start up a complete design of a GSM system would need to pay 20%.That might be correct I don't know .But you can't compare licensing fees for an airinterface with a whole system.IS-95 is an airinterface where GSM is a complete cellular system.What is the cost to start from scratch to build a IS-95 system.I suppose that you have to pay licenses for patents covering the IS-41 and other parts of the system .In reality all the big vendors have IPR:s that they can trade between them so the cost is not so high.For the WCDMA system I heard that there are something like 2500 patents involved.That means that every patentholder can't expect a lot of money Let's go back to the soft handoff function.I don't see it as obvious that you do soft handoffs in a CDMA system.In the analog and TDMA world the mobile get's an order from the system to go to new channel and synchronize and then start transmission. That could have been the method to do it in a CDMA system system also.The mobile gets a new code from the system that it should synchronize to, same frequency or not it doesn't matter. Let's say that Ericsson came up with the idea that let's keep the old channel while connecting to the new one and with this you could get a macrodiversity effect I see that as a new concept and it has nothing to with CDMA specifics.The question is was Ericsson or QCOM or someone else first with this idea? It looks like that Ericsson was first to file for it anyhow/R

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next