Humble question, Rob, may I give it a try?
1. According to PINC.
2. For $36000.
3. According to PINC.
4. On some engines, occasionally, for unspecified cost and time.
5. See #2.
6. Really? You holding your breath?
7. According to PINC, not the SEC, as PINC is not a fully reporting company.
8. According to PINC.
9. For stock exposure, like there's no tomorrow. How much left in PINC's bank account?
10. Indeed. And the well financed competition is heating up.
BONUS: Which way is it going from here?
FBNAers have humorously used appropriate tactics to inform PINCers about their stock, using a hypothetical company to poke fun and show shareholders how easy it is to think that there is a perfect company in the Y2K arena, and that PINC is not worth a hill of beans if it is such a company (which, by the way, has been hypothetically everything to be hypothetically educational). They spend much time showing folks how easy it is to produce a successful appearing fraud company, IMHO.
Some would say that I am trashing this stock. Maybe I am, but for your sake prove me wrong!
Patiently watching.
Cheers,
Svejk
proofsheet.com |
