...but in reality Janice, you and none of the FBN group have any intention of allowing TRUTH to prevail.
That's a silly statement. We have no control whatsoever over the truth.
My point, about which I'm quite serious, was this: over the past few months I've looked in depth at about a half-dozen BB companies. They were in different sectors, had different histories, and were located in different parts of the country. All have, in terms of stock performance, done extremely poorly since they were intially hyped. What is the ONE thing they have in common?
Incompetent or dishonest management. The more of this stuff I do, the more convinced I become that this is the SINGLE most important determining factor in the success or failure of a BB company. Other problems can be resolved; that one's much tougher, as often a BB firm's two or three officers are also the majority shareholders.
And, Janice, what will you say if one of the entities you have so chauvinistically
defended suddenly turns out to be wanted for questioning by the FBI, or some other law
enforcement group ... will you continue to defend them and claim that everyone else is
a bad guy and your defendant is the victim of circumstance?
The "entity" you refer to appears to be Andy Mann. When have I ever "defended" him? I'm saying that the Word as received from the company is not the whole story. Frankly I'd thought I made my point quite clear, and quite obvious.
161!! Palindrome!! GET IT, ELLEN??? |
