Danielle Cheese Slips Through Araldica's Fingers -- FYI...new story just filed...some new, other a re-cap.
  =======================
  Danielle Cheese Slips Through Araldica's Fingers
  Events Latest Setback For Troubled Company
  Araldica Wineries Ltd. has turned up empty-handed in its attempt to purchase the Danielle Cheese Distributors, Inc. from its owner, Jon Swan. 
  "Any discussions with Araldica about the purchase of Danielle Cheese are at an end," Swan's attorney, Michael Matsler told Wine Investment News today. The final shoe dropped Friday, Oct. 23 when Swan's law firm filed for complete dismissal of an April lawsuit Araldica filed against Swan to compel him to sell Danielle to it. 
  These recent events are just the latest in a series of woes for a company       that: 
             * Has never registered its securities,             * Does not have the proper licenses to sell wine.             * Regularly issues news releases and financial information that they            know are incorrect.             * Suffers from serious balance sheet and income statement            problems caused by booking acquisitions that have not completed            or which are no longer being pursued.             * Has a looming shareholder disaster that could dilute outstanding            shares by 5-to-1. 
        Danielle Litigation
        Araldica filed suit against Danielle Cheese in April, charging breach of a       sale agreement which Swan insists was never an agreement at all. On       June 23, a New York Supreme Court judge denied Araldica a       preliminary injunction to compel Swan to sell Danielle to Araldica. At       that time the judge ruled that: Araldica's "papers do not demonstrate to       the Court's satisfaction that it was able to perform its end of the       bargain," namely paying $100,000 and stock valued at 40 cents a share       on closing. 
        After denial of the preliminary injunction, the breach of conduct lawsuit       was continued by the court with discovery and interrogatories to be       exchanged between the parties and a new hearing in court next month. 
        On August 4, Araldica issued a news release saying that they had       reached an "agreement in principal" with Swan to sell Danielle Cheese       for $2,200,000: $700,000 in cash, and the assumption of $1,500,000       of Danielle's corporate debt. The Araldica news release said the deal was       supposed to close in September, but Swan said he never received       Araldica's downpayment. In addition, Matsler said they had received no       response to their court interrogatories. 
        Because of these factors, Swan has asked the court to dismiss Araldica's       suit and to re-pay Swan his court costs and attorney's fees. They've       asked for a Nov. 17 court hearing on the matter. 
        Araldica's President Frank J. Landi, Jr. did not return WIN's faxed request for comment. 
        In fact, Landi has not returned more than two dozen telephone calls,       faxes and e-mails sent to him regarding these and a number of other       issues. 
        
        Araldica Shares Unregistered
        History, though, seems to be repeating itself. In the Com/Link matter,       the SEC nailed Landi on charges of selling unregistered securities. And       now, according to SEC spokesman John Heine, Araldica has never filed a       registration with the agency or a request for an exemption from filing.       The SEC record division also had no registrations from all of Araldica's       previous corporate names, San Diego Wood Recycling, HPI Recycling or       HP Industries. 
        And according to Andrew Kandel, chief of the New York State Bureau of       Investor Protection and Securities, Araldica has filed nothing at all there       as well. 
        How could this be? After all, it is traded on the OTC:BB? Well, NASD's       Scott Peterson said they don't check to make sure that quoted stocks       are actually in legal compliance with registration requirements and that       means the OTC market could be an even Wilder West than most people       imagine. 
        No License To Sell Wine
        On the other hand, it may not pay to cross the people who issue liquor       licenses. New York State Liquor Authority spokeswoman Maris Hart       confirmed that they are investigating Araldica because there is serious       doubt as to whether Araldica can legally sell wine at all. While Araldica's       press releases say it has been "engaged (since 1993) in the importation,       sale and distribution of premium Italian wines...." 
        Hart said the SLA had no record of Araldica having the appropriate       license to sell wine until March 4, 1998 when the liquor license of       Staten-Island-based All Brands Discount Wines & Liquors was       transferred to it. But even that license may be in doubt because Araldica       is no longer doing business at the Staten Island address. "A license to       sell wine or liquor is valid only for the specific address to which it was       issues," Hart said. Selling wine without a license is a felony in New York. 
        Hart also said that said that except in rare instances, people convicted of       felonies cannot manage or own companies with liquor licenses. "They       would need special approval by our board members," said Hart who       confirmed that no such special permission had been requested for       Araldica. 
        Misleading News Releases
        With all these problems, it's hardly a surprise that Araldica's news       releases are not as candid as those of a Big Board company. The       company has issued -- and never retracted or corrected -- news       releases of acquisitions that never happened, big-name board members       who never joined the board and financial numbers that they have never       been able to get a CPA firm to audit despite repeated promises that       audited numbers would be provided. 
        One recent example of this was posted on their web site on Sept. 24,       announcing that they had "completed the legal and financial       arrangements required for it to assume operational control of its Italian       winery and vineyard subsidiary, known as "Azienda Agricola       Antogianni, S.r.l.", located in central Tuscany...." They had previously       announced the acquisition of this winery, owned in part by former       Westinghouse Chairman Paul Lego. 
        But Lego told WIN that Araldica has no more operational control or       ownership over his winery today than they did last November. "There       is a signed letter of intent and if they can come up with the money this       time, then we'll do the deal." 
        Lego explained that this is Araldica's third attempt at buying the       winery, but "they have never been able to come up with the money." In       fact, Lego says that Araldica has defaulted on $120,000 in       down-payments from the two previous unsuccessful purchase attempts.
        On Dec. 4, 1997, Araldica issued a news release which said they had       "completed the acquisition" of the winery and further that Lego would       be joining the AWLT board. Lego said those were not true. The news       release has remained uncorrected on the Araldica Web site       (http://www.araldica.com) long after Araldica was aware that they       were incorrect. 
        Another misleading news release which has remained uncorrected is an       unaudited balance sheet and income statement released by Araldica on       March 12, 1998 claiming that revenues increased from $1 million in       1996 to $8.4 million in 1997 primarily through the acquisition of seven       companies including a cheese company and a winery in Italy. But       according to Louis De Santis, Araldica's Executive Vice President,       Secretary & Director, none of the acquisitions have closed; three and       possibly four of the companies are no longer being worked on as       acquisitions and two of them are subjects of legal action. 
        In addition to Lego's winery, the acquisitions announced by Araldica       include: Super City Gourmet, Deer Park, N.Y. , a specialty foods       distributor, Club Dieta Mediterranea, S.r.l., Avezzano (Pescara), Italy, a       distributor of gourmet foods; All-Brands Discount Wines & Liquors,       Staten Island, N.Y., a wine retailer Willcox Inn of Aiken, S.C., Gold Coast       Traders, Inc., a Bethel, Conn., distributor of gourmet foods and       beverages and Danielle Cheese Distributors Inc. of Goshen, N.Y., So far       the only company whose owner will confirm that a sale has actually been       completed is John Caparimo, former owner of All Brands. 
        Louis De Santis, (then President and CEO), confirmed in a July       interview with WIN that the failure of that deal to close also caused the       failure of its attempts to acquire Gold Coast Traders. 
        "Danielle is one of the reasons why Antogianni is not completed, because       if Danielle was completed, then we'd have the funding based on       Danielle's assets. So it's a domino effect." De Santis said the Danielle       acquisition was key because it would provide Araldica with assets it       could borrow against to use in completing other acquisitions." Despiute       the news release on his web site, DeSantis told me he "never heard of"       the announced Willcox Inn acquisition. 
        Finally, in an attempt to discredit Wine Investment News,, Araldica       issued a news release on Sept. 2, claiming that it "engaged the New York       City law firm of Robson and Miller to file a lawsuit against the "Wine       Investment News" newsletter, of Sonoma, California, for libel,       defamation and slander." No legal action has yet been filed and there       have been no communicatoons with any law firm concerning it. 
        Balance Sheet Problems
        The AWLT balance sheet, which shows total assets of $11,313,377,       contains a single item -- $5 million for "prepaid television time" -- which       by all estimates may worth as little as $120,000. 
        On August 7, 1997, Araldica said it traded 2 million shares of its common       stock to a company called Access America for a "$5 million block of       network broadcast time, which it plans to use this Fall [1997] to       introduce its proprietary line of premium Italian specialty foods." That       campaign has not yet started. 
        The announcement seems like an attempt to pump up the asset side of       its balance sheet. According to the news release: "The planned television       exposure is expected to vastly expand our direct response reach, and       allows ARALDICA to increase its asset base immediately by $5 million,       which brings the Company closer to its goal of filing for NASDAQ listing       before the end of 1997." No such listing has been applied for says the       NASD. And even though Araldica stock was trading at about $0.40 at       the time, the company valued shares at $2.50, a price it has never       traded at. 
        Access America, according to its VP Dick Wharton, is a part-time       operation operated out of Wharton's small advertising agency, Nuss       Wharton Advertising, in the Philadelphia suburb of Havertown. And       instead of "network broadcast time" which implies major network       access, Wharton said Araldica's commercials, if they are ever produced,       would air on low-power and UHF TV as well as local access cable and       direct satellite broadcast channels. 
        When asked how Araldica would assess whether or not it was getting full       value for its stock barter deal, Wharton said, "There's no way to find       out," because, he said, there is no Neilsen-type rating system evaluating       the market which Araldica's ads might reach. 
        As if all that wasn't bad enough, the validity of the $5 million carried on       the Araldica balance sheet seems to have no basis in reality. Liz Fender,       spokeswoman for the American Institute of CPAs in New York, said that       while prepaid expenses can be legitimate assets, the standards for       valuing this type of non-monetary transaction are "generally the fair       market value of what you got or what you gave for the asset whichever       is the most easily determined." 
        While not commenting on the Araldica case specifically, Fender said that       in a case like this "the most obvious value would be the market value of       the stock." Using these standards, the proper balance sheet value of the       pre-paid television time asset would be a small fraction of that claimed       by Araldica or about $80,000 at its recent trading price. 
        Massive Dilution Problems For Shareholders
        What's more, the an interview with C. Elvin Feltner of New York, who       owns Access America indicates a different structure for the deal which       has serious implications for Araldica's existing shareholders. Feltner said       he "will get $5 million in Araldica stock" regardless of the stock price. 
        "They'll have to issue make-good shares," he said if the stock price does       not trade at the $2.50 valuation placed on the shares in the original       agreement. If he were to close on the television time deal at Araldica's       recent trading price of about $0.04 Feltner would be owed 125 million       shares. According to Interwest Stock Transfer, there are 25,685,072       shares issued. 
  President Convicted of Fraud 
        Records from the SEC, the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern       District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Prisons show that Landi       was sentenced to eight years at the country-club-like Danbury (Conn.)       federal prison on June 2, 1983 after being convicted of 13 counts of mail       and wire fraud in connection with a company called Com/Link       International Corp. of New Rochelle, N.Y. Landi, as founder, President       and CEO of Com/Link defrauded "a total of approximately $2,860,600       from several hundred public investors" in connection with a cordless       phone scheme. 
        The SEC would not comment on whether it is investigating or not; the       New York State Liquor Authority said it is investigating; Kandel said       that his office is following up on leads but that they "don't have the time       or the personnel" to devote more resources to the case.   |