Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 168.09

+1.8%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (17218)	10/27/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: Thomas Sprague	Read Replies (1) of 152472

In an NDA ERICY is agreeing, for the purposes of the NDA only, that the technology is QCOM's. Remember the point of these agreements is evaluation of technology from someone else. They certainly reserve the right to say "no we already invented that." Which is what they are claiming in Texas. However, they have to prove that in court, which I believe is a big problem for them. My point is that pro forma agreement to ownership in a Secrecy Agreement is moot in court, and ERICY still must prove they perfected the art and patented it before QCOM. Thomas Sprague

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next