CXI-Commodore Environmental Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CXI-Commodore Environmental

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: HEM3 who wrote (1280)	10/27/1998 8:38:00 AM
From: hcm1943	Read Replies (1) of 1755

By "slick" assume you are refering to Billery Clinton. It is not the time table that is is at issue but rather the the method of disposal. The military was assigned the task of finding alternitive technologies to incineration but committed billions of $s to incinerators and would look foolish if they found a better, cheaper, and safer means to dispose of chem weapons. From the people I have spoken with it is my opinion the the military chose to go foward with techs they know will ultimatly fail. The best techs were the SET process and Silver II which were not funded in the final round. I would strongly suggest you go to www.cwwg.org and spend some time reading their releases

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next