Read-Rite Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Read-Rite

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stitch who wrote (4185)	10/27/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver	Read Replies (1) of 5058

<<Actually, during the last conference call management indicated that the trend towards fewer heads per drive might be reversing.>> I heard this also and it seemed to be said with reservation. They said it could have been because they were improving their product mix and getting more heads into higher end drives. They saw this increase as a contradiction, but that would be an explanation. What do you think of Fujitsu going GMR now. Will they have shortages, low yields, etc that will be a product of racing ahead with new technology, or have they got the processes in place to make a smooth transition? Can other drive makers expect a similar experience? Who will benefit from this move to higher end components? Obviously, RDRT is not the only maker of GMR. Do you think Fujitsu will be kicking the others in the butt to keep up, or will they be satisfied with MR a little longer? Do you think RDRT has any chance of getting into Fujitsu? Is there any difference between an enterprise head and desktop head? Seems like they should be the same, but just slightly higher on the technology curve thereby getting higher prices and perhaps more heads in a drive. Regards, Mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next