SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FuzzFace who wrote (2715)10/27/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: jwk  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
Edwik! -- my best guess is that the bottom had ALL the bad news and downside risk factored into it, so as soon as there was a glimmer of light, growth was brisk. Perhaps with sighquest's current situation the market will be a bit more discrimminating in differentiating between the prospects for removeable makers.
Of course then, Lumpy could be right. Nah. Notice how there has been no mention of the ATOMM thing from him since the weekend.

Does anyone remember SteveWiz(?) or whomever it was way back when who was always posting his *price compression* theories? Recent move reminded me of what I think I remember of his stuff.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News