Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.33

-1.0%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dave who wrote (17240)	10/27/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) of 152472

post.messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com Some interesting history all in one place. Ericy vs The Q! Thanks Greg! Mqurice PS: Dave, you didn't use the word flippism. The suggestion that anything can happen, there is only 1% or 3% chance of The Q! or Ericy getting a clean sweep, that is is all very problematic, that there are many ways from A to B etc and so on leads to the conclusion that all patent cases are decided arbitarily = flippism. I say that judges and patent cases are based in some rationality. The particular stuff we are dealing with here seems to mean, any way I measure it, by any reasonable reading of 'seeing whether a channel is clear in the other base station' and all the rest, that QUALCOMM will have a clean sweep and the charades will be ditched. Look at all the noise and distraction L M Ericsson has created. FUD in profusion. Even patent people seem puzzled! Amazing!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next