... IPM as an example of shareholder communication disaster was the
message I was giving in my post. To those on this GPGI thread that
are not aware of the IPM saga, the management put a wall of silence
around themselves after poor results were obtained from the company.
Lack of communication, where one feels a victim, is a strong catalyst
that can drastically escalate bad feeling between a group to a level
that become near impossible for reconciliation to be possible.
I suggest again to Dennis DeNoble to reply to the concerns expressed
by all those shareholders who have posted their view that as owners
of GPGI thru their investments, that they have not only the right to
be honestly informed by GPGI, but by not doing so can only be taken
as a means by GPGI to hide facts, and in life hidden facts are mostly
done by person who are trying to hide mistakes, or by person who have
no respect for others.
The details of the latest GPGI hic-up have not been officially released,
but if what Bob speculated today is close to what happened, then the only
permanent damage done was time lost from when GPGI can deliever as a
successful company.
If the president of GPGI, or whoever is top boss, thinks that all that has
to be done is finally get to the point of receiving money for precious metals,
then that all will be ok and no hard feeling anymore. If so, wrong.
Doug |
