SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raven McCloud who wrote (2736)10/28/1998 12:29:00 AM
From: Reseller  Read Replies (2) of 10072
 
Re: Isn't it true though, that removable storage has a greater
failure rate than fixed storage?

The failure rate between hard drives and removable drives
isn't a fair comparison. Hard drives are exhaustively used by
systems so much so that a higher failure rate is expected.. It
is my experience that their failure rate is greater than
Zip drives.

>>If that's the case then those business that want great assurance would chose to go with fixed storage over removable. <<

Further a hard drive crash is most often catastrophic while with
removable drives the data is more often stored on more
than one disk ( should be, I've got at least four copies of my data )
there by lessening the impact of the loss of drive. I don't
care about the drive, I care about my data.

I can't speak for the industry other than my own experience
but wouldn't expect my numbers to be an exception
Regards
Reseller

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext