If the non_techies do not think the IE should be integrated with OS, that is why they are non_techies.
Can you tell me why IE should not be integrated into OS?. Do you think the air conditions should be integrated into a car ? If you think the air conditions shouldbe
integrated into a car, then can you tell me why you don't think IE should be integrated with OS ? If you think the air conditions should not be integrated into a car, then can you tell me why the IE should not be integrated into the OS either.
To me , the OS just like a car, you can either integrate the OS with IE or not. I think
the IE should be integrated with OS to make it part of the features of OS, and at the same time consumers can also download the navigator easily from the Netcenter
if they like Navigator. So , it won't hurt consumers' right of free choice, , because
most of the computers have enough memory to let two different bowsers exist at the
same time. But, for Cars, you just do not have enough space for two air conditions.
So, if the air conditions is integrated with the car, most consumers probably will not
buy another air conditions due to the limitation of space in the car. So integrating the air conditions into the car really hurt consumers' freedom of choice. But, integrate the IE into OS won't hurt the consumers' freedom of choice. Consumers still have freedom to download the navigator, if NSCP offers a better choice. Of course, if
NSCP can't offer a better choice , like the AOL business, then it is NSCP's fault, nobody should be suffered for NSCP's own fault. That is just my opinion. Of course
you are free to have yours, and let people on this thread to make their own judgements. |
