He used it in almost every email stunt in 1997 and 1998 and listed on his website for three years.
And that reflects badly on LBOR how? Do you really think they were paying FSS to be listed on that pathetic site all that time?
My understanding (take it for what it's worth) is that what FSS was doing by listing LBOR on their sight fit squarely into Count # 4 of the SEC charges against FSS.
LBOR was a pump and dump game, as I understood it from Bruss...
Jeffry, do have any knowledge of this provided to by a reliable source? Bruss does not exactly qualify as a paragon of integrity exactly, does he?
Did LBOR have a PR firm working for it back when it was on the BB? I would assume they did. That's not exactly a crime. Nor is a small co. that's trying to increase its profile in the public eye by paying for publicity. Most of us would call that advertising. Would you like to know how many Lucent Technology ads directed towards investors I've read in investment magazines over the last two weeks? So, I suppose we can now say LU is pumping its stock now, too, right?
Maybe that's not what you are saying, Jeffry, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's sure as shootin' how it's coming across.
IF a PR firm working for LBOR way back when did pay for advertising for LBOR, how would they be at fault? Go back and read the SEC complaint one more time - it's FSS being charged, and they're being charged because of nondisclosure issues and making false statements. Do you have any knowledge that anything false was being said about LBOR (other, possibly, than FSS pumping ITS record by trying to stand on LBOR's coattails).
Just curious - what aspect of LBOR would be a 'pump' anyway? Have they ever made false statements in their PR's, investor information, media interveiws or SEC filings? How did LBOR attempt to 'pump'?
Again, paying for publicity (if it even ever happened) back when they were a OTCBB co. hardly makes a co. a 'pump.' One would hope you would do better than that.
...but LBOR's history is questionable at best.
Realllly? I don't suppose you'd care to substantiate or otherwise back up such a comment? Please, I'm truly curious and want to know - what alleged skeletons are you implying exist?
Give me a break.
Doubt the truth will be hidden for long from the SEC. You don't think your boys at LBOR are going to avoid in depth investigation, do you?
Somehow, I'm not exactly worried, and neither is the co. I do know that the co. has been in contact w/ the SEC re: the rumors and manipulation that drove the price down in August and re: the Quantum stunt that occurred in September. And I can also tell you that the contact was not initiated by the SEC, but rather by LBOR mgmt. This doesn't exactly sound like a co. that's wanting to avoid dealing w/ the SEC in any way, shape, or form, does it Jeffry?
You better hope Bruss was the only bad guy on the LBOR side of the FSS hype.
That you'd even try to sling crap like this speaks very loudly that you have little or no understanding of the SEC action in the first place.
Like I said before, this is all a spare-me w/ respect to LRW.
But, as long as we are being 'honest' here, Jeffry, what exactly is your motivation here?? You wouldn't exactly be short now, would you??
Like the man says, duh.
Is this the best you shorts can come up w/, because, forgive me for saying, this is PATHETIC. Can't you find any kind of justification for your short position based on fundamentals or perhaps on substantiated items about the co.? That the majority of the (or maybe I should just say, the vocal) shorts can only try to play connect-the-dots and not say anything of substance about the co. makes me think that you guys don't even know why you have a short position here in the first place, other than just one of the herd. Such lack of ability to think for one's own self gives me reason to crack up when dealing w/ some of these types. Jeffry, I'm not trying to slam you or anything, believe me, but come on!! This is sad, and you know it. |
