Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6343)	10/31/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) of 11603

Larry, sorry for my overreaction, but I didn't see the <g> or <VBG> so I assumed the worst. The thread negativism is catching. <VBG> <<worst place on the property>> I don't think that Maxam ever used the paleo-channel mapping for decision making before, just the drill holes and some of Hewlett's contour mapping based on hole and trenching results. What is very interesting is that the area where Maxam results were poor is at drill hole A-5, right in the red/yellow of the map, bad. What is also enlightening is that previous Hewlett mappings don't necessarily agree with the new technology. I don't know if that's good or bad, but it could help explain some of the past inconsistencies. The 10 hole COC test to be drilled this month will demonstrate the value for the new technology, I cant wait for the results because that could be a key to low cost evaluation of the potential of the other Maxam properties. I view this as potentially seminal for future desert dirt mining, Chuca's new-tech.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next