Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)

AENG 0.0001000

0.0%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cornbread who wrote (2196)	10/31/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (3) of 3383

Cornbread, I have not deemed your information useless and have shown you respect as I think you may actually understand what the ENGINE is. I am not sure that you understand what AENG is and is not. Nor am I sure you understand what a $200 million Valuation means whether or not the patent is protectable. As for "If you have some engineering data that supports your claim I would be more than happy to see it." I, like you, have clearly gone through the trouble to obtain the patent (as I told you I would) and am now as someone who has two engineering degrees (one in Mechanical Engineering and who won a President's award to study new carburetoration methods as an undergraduate) asking someone who also appears to be an engineer about long term wear and manufactureablity of the technology that AENG is claiming can enrich you all. Cornbread, I have shown you and you only in the opposition respect (I clearly have none for any of the others) so I can see why you do not hear me very well. The fact is that I've read the patent and am now asking you technical questions. You may choose to answer them or not. But you must also acknowledge that even if everything about the engine is true, the Company is what may own it and this chat board is about the Company AENG US and oxtwo is a subcategory of that discussion. I am addressing you on your turf and giving you every opportunity to debate the feasibility of this thing. Remember that the Wankel is dead-the problems were too costly to overcome and the companies involved there were long established and legitimate. And so the thread waits on ice for your response. Use any metal composition you like, just make it cost effective, manufacturable and with a 100,000 mile MTBF. Thanks, AG.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next