ARP - V Argentina Gold Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mr Metals who wrote (924)	11/1/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) of 3282

Hi MM. OFF TOPIC: I think this may settle the VB vs SVB discussion; Leader Mining has elected not to invest the level of exploration expenditures required to meet the work commitment whereby it would retain its earn-in option for Celtic Minerals' Voisey's Bay claims. However, Leader still retains its earn-in options with Ivory Oils and Minerals and the NDT Ventures consortium claims adjacent to Inco's Voisey's Bay claims. So, I don't think they'll rally based on SVB. I still await whether this SVB is a suckers rally or there is substantiation for it. If true than assuming they are in fact drilling "next to 16" then it will be shortlived no matter what the results. I think the ideal thing for LMN is to have the strike on GKR property....and if we thought that was true....then GKR! the Chief

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next