SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MGMA is in a position to make you a lot of money
MGMA 0.400+399,940.0%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Judith who wrote (25)11/3/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: Walter Morton   of 175
 
Why Playboy's Price/Earnings Ratio is 60 and MGMA's is 7:

quicken.com

Playboy's five year expected growth rate is an unbelievable 223%.
MGMA's five year expected growth rate is an excellent 25%.

Playboy's P/E was 60. MGMA's growth rate is 11.2% of PLA's growth rate:

PLA's P/E of 60 X 11.2% = 6.73 (a comparative P/E for MGMA).

If MGMA achieves its goal of $.40 earnings per share by May 1999, their stock price should be:

MGMA's Earnings Per Share of $.40 X MGMA's P/E Ratio of 6.73 = $2.69 Stock Price.

MGMA's current stock price seems to be very much in line with its expected value and future earnings projections.

Therefore, at this time, I would not buy MGMA for more than $2.69 if I believed it would only achieve $.40 of earnings per share. However, if I thought MGMA would not achieve its earnings per share goals, I would pay less than $2.69 per share. On the other hand, if I thought MGMA was capable of achieving earnings per share of $.60 per share by May 1999, I would think today's stock price looked pretty good.

P.S. I am not a stock broker, licensed financial analyst nor a representative of MGMA. These are just my personal opinions.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext