Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Walter Brownlee who wrote (6984)	11/3/1998 6:15:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (2) of 25548

Piece of cake-Walt-just need to read it over a few times. Basically, MDIN's filed this document with the court of appeals. The document outlines why the Olivos/Dayton case should be thrown out on appeal. Looks like there is 6 reasons why the case should be thrown out. The biggy is the fact that Dayton didn't file in the property register-only the discovery register. They don't have title to Churrmata-therefore how can they say somebody else's claim-ie Olivos is invalid when they have no say in the matter?!:) Olivos did all the proper things to do in Chilean law. Olivos does have clear title. I assume you know what the consequenses are if Olivos/MDIN wins the appeal.(ie Daytons claims are thrownout.) The real interesting fact is why MDIN posted this today? Are they expecting a ruling tomorrow? By the way, don't ask me what is meant by THE RIGHT Section #2). That section is mumbo jumbo to me!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next