SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave Parr who wrote (40974)11/6/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) of 1573849
 
Dave - Re: " But would you agree that there are much greater
possibilities for AMD to do better in the future?"

No.

AMd has always sold chips that will plug into sockets in a market that was developed entirely by Intel.

AMD has no track record of creating their own successful standards.

The 3DNOW is the first attempt and nobody but a few game designers seem to care - and very few of them at that !

With the K7, AMD faces another hurdle - that of creating a whole new infrastructure of Chip Sets, motherboards, BIOS, etc., that will go along with the K7. AMD has never before done this and the potential K7 minor advantages and low volumes may be so small as to make this highly unlikely.

Since the K7 can't piggy back on the Intel-created hardware infrastructure, my guess is that the K7 will achieve the same success as AMD's 29000 RISC chip - interesting for a few applications but destined for the bit bucket in the sky.

The possibility that Intel's Katmai Instructions establishes another standard for high performance processors then leaves AMD's entire product line in jeopardy as being non-standard/incompatible with new software.

The downside risks for AMD are, once again, VERY REAL and VERY LARGE.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext