Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (10772)	11/7/1998 5:40:00 AM
From: Shirley Owen	Read Replies (2) of 14627

Hi Bill, Cut a little slack for Gerry and Dru while you're at it. When he did that loan deal with that shark, he was probably desperate for money to keep the company afloat. Can't be too hard on him for that. Granted, they shouldn't have given this character free trading shares but sometimes when you're desperate you do foolish things. I still say he kept PFG alive so it could fight another day. I sure don't know why John's name would be included in the lawsuit as he was only an employee as the investor relations guy. Sounds like the usual format, sue everyone in sight and hope something sticks. I sure hope the courts throw this out. I hate bloodsuckers. Don't forget when he was going to sell the La Colorada and we bitched about it, he listened to the shareholders and kept it. That is probably when he was forced to go to the shark. If I recall, he had 3 suitors for the property, one of which was Rio Tinto. Had he sold, we wouldn't be waiting with baited breath for some sign of hope there. I'm sure CMS and crew will be able to make good headway with this case in any event. Cheers Shirley

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next