Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mrknowitall who wrote (13680)	11/7/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

So what yourself, Mr. moral grand inquisitor Jr. So, we disagree, and you continue to give me the big lecture about how you're right and I'm wrong. Politically speaking, I'd say evidence is on my side. I'll reach back for another quote. "I thought from day one, as I think today, that this was bad for the country," said one of Starr's defenders who now questions his tactics. "Sometimes you have to exercise prosecutorial discretion." Even though this defender of Starr said he believed the president was guilty of significant misconduct, he said, "the cost to the country far outweighs the value of proving it." (from nytimes.com Want to take that one on, K? "Sometimes you have to exercise prosecutorial discretion." Starr shot his wad, 4 years of dirt digging and nothing on the President but BJgate and Clinton's alleged lack of cooperation with him in spreading the lurid details far and wide. You want to keep flogging it, be my guest.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next