Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: teevee who wrote (1604)	11/7/1998 4:53:00 PM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (1) of 2251

teevee, I'm not hung up on fancies, I'd just like to know why they made a point to mention them in the one NR and then dropped any mention of them in later NRs. They would add to the $/tonne, would they not? What are the odds that a bigger bulk sample would be any different from the 200 tonne sample? Why not just do a few more 200 tonne samples from a few different spots along the cone/dyke several hundred meters apart? Wouldn't that be a better test of uniformity than taking 5000 tonnes from one spot? What's the best way of proving the valuation of the 200 tonnes wasn't a fluke like Bishop and other naysayers allege? What are you thoughts on WSP's timetable for drilling, and their priorities? Do they concentrate on delineation? Finding a pipe (sounds like it maybe be too deep and thus too expensive to drill for now). Would much greater tonnage change their capital requirements should they try to get a feasibility study ASAP?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next