TA-Quotes Plus Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unixgeek who wrote (7631)	11/7/1998 9:56:00 PM
From: John Schott	Read Replies (1) of 11149

TWICE AS FAST I am getting interesting results (amid some crash problems). I installed the Beta on two relatively sluggish Pentium Thinkpads (560 - 133 MHZ and 380 - 1560 MHZ with MMX). The 560 has 34MB and the 380 has 48MB of RAM. They both have essentially the same 2.1 GB disk (carefully defragmented, too). Both machines are IBM economy specials - so they have no level 2 cache which effectively reduces their performance about 20%+ in my general experience relative to similar speed machines with L2 cache. But this isn't a QP2 performance comparison, just a general one. From some partial tests using some of the simple stock scans supplied with QP: * 560 (limited testing): Scan speeds seem to offer about a 50% improvement (i.e. run in about 2/3 the time * 380: Scan speeds range from about 2.4 to 3 times faster ! I haven't deduced any reason for the significant improvement difference. Anyone have any ideas why?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next