You really shouldn't presume to tell a guy who he's "with". What's the use of that? But if it makes you comfortable to put me in a box with some loathed others, enjoy, it's your right I suppose.
I trust by your silence on much of my post that you may find much of it just about right. You don't admit this Presidents actions are all to reminiscent of Nixon; but obviously when I point it out, you have no response, either. Disturbing, no? Lawrence Walsh has an an opinion nothing more.
Frankly, if the president is on the job when he speaks to the American people(and he is) and he then lies to protect his rep. with them, with lies amounting to slander against CITIZEN accusors, it is an abuse of office. It alone is enough. Frankly, Walsh is wrong in my opinion anyway, because I think the founders clearly intended that of all the politicians running around, such a one as would become president should be ABOVE the rest in character- and they tried to ensure this would be the case. They intended to hold a President to a higher standard than mere congressmen, they wanted him to be one of the outstanding few amoung politicians, and they said so.
This is our Pee Wee Herman President who is worse than Pee Wee because he slanders otherwise mere sexually consenting(Well, SOME consented) female American Citizens as liars, with the voice of his high office and the trust placed therein behind him, when HE is clearly the liar(which I don't hear you denying). Yes THIS is enough, even without perjury in court. This issue is rampant slandering and lying far more than it is sex, and it thus crosses political lines. It's downright against the American way!(VBG-but true enough- sense of fair play and all-geez, how'd you like to be the she against a presidential HE? He's a putz!) His actions meet the standard for impeachment and he may duly go before the Senate soon. Yes, as 40% of the polled say, he Ought to resign. Just as Bob Packwood did. |
