Said no more posts here but your last post deserves a response, i understood everything you wrote and i agree completely, and after another post i got from here, i am moving on, no more posts here good or bad from me.
Yes it was anger for reasons you mention and anger at myself for my early posting style i was far too trusting and too generous with praise.
Last point not for you per se but at least one person it turns was paying attention to what i write, didnt think anyone listened so this is more for him, the dividend is brillian it inspires long term investing by restricting for one year.
However, what if after a reverse merger, a company only sold lets say 500k shares out of 21 million, stock tanked from lets say $7 to 50 cents, selling was that 500k shares, this means that company really still owns all the shares no one bought so company owns right.
If you knew you were about to begin a major promotion, 5-10 bang bang releases, and you give a 1 for 8 dividend right before buying is coming in arent you really giving yourself another 1/8th ownership because you all own all the shares and are really getting entire dividend.
Took me till recently to figure that one out, that's why he's so dangerous, throw in total control of all votes,
he took me to school fast track style learning curve leveling off,
that's why i left, nuff said, hope dumping is done and you guys rock n roll
good luck everyone
Jesse |
