Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: teevee who wrote (1619)	11/8/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: whiskeyjack	Read Replies (1) of 2251

teevee;on hole cl98-19, Wsp doesn't tell us at what depth the K was encountered. Tracing backwards(north easterly, reversing glacial transport) along from NW dyke, K at about 70m to hole 15 K at 98m to hole 16 K at 212 and 232m to whatever depth hole 19 hit. I see a source possibility emerging from roundish (unnamed)lake stradling King/CL claim boundary. CL 186 hit about 100m of K to a depth of about 200m. Can we triangulate east from hole 16 to CL 186 to an apex at this lake or am I being too simplistic? This hole 17 base dropping to 478m fits for your down dip cone theory other than source which is confusing me. Like your wishful thinking of 120 million tonnes, mine is to locate the source of this very complex puzzle on Wsp 100% King claim. I never was much good at sharing. Cheers whiskeyjack

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next