Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maxwell who wrote (41079)	11/8/1998 10:26:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 1574054

Re: ". MR estimates are as good as any one. $6 difference is about right." So you are saying that the CeleronA and the PII die costs are the same, even though the CeleronA die is much bigger and getting crappy yields (your claim, not mine). That means that the PII yield must be in the 70s also because a wafer costs the same pretty much independent of what product gets put on it. With the same number of total good die even with a smaller die, Intel must be running a lower ISO for the PII than the CeleronA, if your statements are correct. This is most strange Maxwell. The PII is a much more mature product so why is it running at a lower ISO? That is.. if your statements are correct.... EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next