SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Famularo who wrote (6503)11/9/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: Jesse  Read Replies (2) of 7966
 
Thanks for posting that Frank! What can I add? ;) I'm glad you've reigned in the misunderstood (but proportionately appropriate!) enthusiasm here. Folks need to realize that even an average grade of 30cpht ("carats per hundred tonne", or 0.3cpt) is excellent given the v. low extraction costs in Alberta (again, due to the accommodating logistical advantages that the AB environment offers). A grade of 30cpht can be viewed as the equivalent of up to 5 to 10 times that number in the NWT (proportionately), depending on stone values (which, as a bonus, is rumoured to be high in AB), etc. These ACA Alberta near-surface, open-pittable kimberlites offer very high profit potential -- it's feasible that anything over 15cpht is, economic. *This is my opinion, remember!*

Other factors, such as fancies (colored gem quality diamonds), larger stones (value increases factorially with gem size), and more, affect profits markedly-- to the positive.

Few actually are aware of this it seems, and Ashton would just as soon keep it that way until things are sewn up further.

Regards,
-j
:>
PS -- ACA smelling good this a.m.
PPS -- your comment re. going onto a major bulk sampling by ACAjv can be seen as a true indication of the economic viability
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext