RANDGOLD and EXPLORATION (RANGY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : RANDGOLD and EXPLORATION (RANGY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: EZbeliever who wrote (120)	11/9/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: baystock	Read Replies (1) of 448

I've been buying today based on the assumption that it was a 1 for 3 reverse split: I've had 3 different sources: 1) my broker Ameritrade called me this morning saying that my buy order that I placed on the weekend and that got filled on the basis that the split was 7 for 10 had been cancelled because according to him the split was 3 for 1 2) Gerry says Schwab told him it was 3 for 1 3) The nasdaq web site nasdaq.com shows the price has dropped today and uses 3 x 81 cents = $2.43 as the reference But the reorg department of Ameritrade says it was a 7 for 10. So in the confusion I've been buying. Of course I will be screwed if it does turn out to be a 7 for 10... Ram

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next