SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas J. Smith who wrote (3696)11/9/1998 8:32:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
Pigman: I did research your record on Iomega, and it is perfectly terrible. As I have previously posted, your posts demonstrate that you were long IOM at 14 just before last January's debacle. My research of your posts demonstrate that you were short IOM three weeks ago, when it was half its price. My research demonstrates that you were short Dell last January, and Dell has almost tripled since. My research shows that you liked Borland at 29 last December, and since then it fell to 13 before it was bought out. My research shows that you called a top three weeks ago for CSCO, GE, and INTC. Since your call all three went up ten percent. Now we see your so-called perfect calls, but you don't seem to remember the time, date, and you darn well don't remember the price, because IOM has never hit a split adjusted 33. Moreover, you were short three weeks ago on MSFT. Now you are claiming that you were long.

However, you did get one characterization right about your work in this most recent post--CRAPOLA is really the perfect description of your work. Indeed, you are not even a very clever writer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext