Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 166.05

+0.6%

Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bux who wrote (18071)	11/10/1998 12:52:00 AM
From: Anthony	Read Replies (1) of 152472

<< Considering the Star tac is 40% lighter and has a battery life 4X longer is a death blow for the Qphone. >> I was searching and looking for the spec sheet for this CDMA Star tac on Motorola website and come up empty. I don't think it is even listed. Even with GSM/Amp Star tac I could not even found a spec on weight or battery life. Their website is terrible if you ask me. I like Nokia and Qcom sites much better they clearly listed all the specs for you. I could be way off but if someone could come up with the actual specs sheet like the Q800 phone then pls post so we can all get a direct comparision.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next