There is a lot of risk of taking CSCO stock at the current price, considering CSCO's earning growth has been slowing down in the last 2-quarter. It is clearly that CSCO's competitors are starting to do quite well in the current quarter, thanks to CSCO's weak and expensive products. We will find out how CS and COMS are doing in a month or so, and clearly ASND is doing quite well in the quarter too. Gig Ethernet and layer 3 switching are taking off like a wire fire and some startups has great products to offer.
Brokerage recommendation at times is traps to dump out for some handsome profits.
Excerpt from one of the more creditable review from DataComm (much knowledgable than Network Computing Joe C.'s review):
----Brainier Boxes -- The latest gigabit Ethernet backbone switches have more than speed to offer-like intelligent routing and QOS
David Newman, Tadesse Giorgis, and Farhad Yavari-Issalou
Along with NSTL Inc. (Conshohocken, Pa.), Data Comm evaluated five gigabit Ethernet backbone boxes and found that all have what it takes for backbone service: high port density, intelligent routing, quality-of-service features-and blazing speed. We did a complete workup on each switch, looking at 15 different measures of backbone suitability and offering far more traffic than we have in any past test. And the numbers were staggering: Most of these switches routed IP traffic at up to 36 million packets per second-three times better than what we offered in previous gigabit Ethernet tests. What's more, all five boxes proved adept at fielding traffic from thousands of attached devices.
Results like that made it hard to pick a winner, but in the end we gave Tester's Choice awards to two products. The Powerrail 5200 from Packet Engines Inc. (Spokane, Wash.) aced nearly every performance routine, and it also offers a long and impressive features list. And the Bigiron 4000 from Foundry Networks Inc. (Sunnyvale, Calif.) posted stellar numbers as well-boasting the highest address learning capacity among the field. Both switches rank as the fastest we've ever tested.
Roster Rundown
A quick scan of our test lineup is all it takes to notice the absence of some major players. Such vendors as Cisco Systems Inc. (San Jose, Calif.) and 3Com Corp. (Santa Clara, Calif.) have gigabit Ethernet boxes, but for the most part these are Layer 2 devices, edge switches with one or two high-speed uplinks, or both. Cisco, perhaps mindful of the revenues generated by its routers, doesn't have a gigabit Ethernet switch with both IP routing and high port density. 3Com has the Superstack II Switch 9300, but it's strictly a Layer 2 device.
In fact, when we called for products last August, only four vendors could deliver all the features our readers say they really need on the corporate backbone: Bay Networks Inc. (Santa Clara, Calif.), Extreme, Foundry, and Packet Engines (see Table 1
Switches from these vendors are suited for even the largest enterprises, with support for up to 73 gigabit Ethernet ports and dozens or hundreds of Ethernet and fast Ethernet ports. And Packet Engines offers interfaces for ATM, FDDI, and packet-over-Sonet networks. What's more, all the devices we looked at route IP. Switches from Foundry and Packet Engines also route IPX, while Bay says it will add IPX support to its Accelar 1200 by year's end.
The list of added features doesn't end there. All vendors also offer some type of QOS mechanism-essential on the backbone. Switches from Bay and Packet Engines, for instance, can prioritize traffic based on settings in the IP header's TOS (type of service) field. The beta version of Extreme's Black Diamond 6800 prioritizes flows based on TCP or UDP (user datagram protocol) port number, and Packet Engines says its switch can prioritize based on the signature of a given application. All vendors also support the IEEE's 802.1p and 802.1Q specifications for defining VLANs (virtual LANs) and prioritizing among them.
Finally, all the switches support four groups of RMON (remote monitoring) on every port, allowing net managers to get a view of MAC (media access control)-layer switch statistics and history and set alarms without dedicating costly RMON probes. (But none support all groups of RMON or RMON 2.)
Speed's the Thing
Those functions all help make these switches right for the backbone, but speed is still what counts most. To find out how they stand up to heavy traffic, we deployed Smartbits analyzers from Netcom Systems Inc. (Chatsworth, Calif.) to offer wire-speed traffic on up to 24 gigabit Ethernet ports at a time. That's the highest density yet in a Data Comm test. But we also offered lots of different traffic: In all, we conducted 15 different tests of Layer 2 and 3 forwarding rates, broadcast latency, Layer 2 address learning, head-of-line blocking, and routing lookup performance (see "Test Methodology"). We ran these tests with eight gigabit Ethernet ports, then repeated them with 24 ports on the boxes from Extreme, Foundry, and Packet Engines.
Bay's Accelar 1200 was the odd box out, dropping nearly 47 percent of traffic when we offered a 100 percent load. Packet loss fell somewhat with lighter loads, but even at 80 percent it dropped nearly 34 percent of packets. And the Bay switch continued to drop traffic even when we offered 1,518-byte packets: It lost nearly 34 percent of a wire-speed load and around 20 percent of an 80 percent load.
Packet Engines offers a function called on-demand learning that gets at the flooding issue and could allow its switch to learn a higher aggregate number of addresses. Instead of flooding unknown addresses to all ports, new addresses are cached by a management module and forwarded only to other ports within the same VLAN (virtual LAN) or broadcast domain. While we verified that on-demand learning reduces the amount of flooded traffic, it was beyond the scope of the test to find out whether the approach increases the aggregate number of addresses that can be learned.
Over in the address learning rate tests, Foundry's Bigiron 4000 once again was the leader, learning more than 70,000 addresses per second (see Figure 3). The smaller Foundry switch was next, learning at a rate of nearly 50,000 addresses per second. The other three learned between 4,800 and 5,800 addresses per second. Extreme says it's still working on this part of the beta software we tested; it actually expected to see a far lower rate.
Layered Takes
We also repeated the test with 24 ports-which meant devices would have to route at an aggregate rate of nearly 36 million pps.
With eight ports, most products turned in perfect performances (see Figure 4). The Extreme and Packet Engines boxes forwarded 100 percent of packets without loss, as did Foundry's Bigiron 4000. Foundry's Turboiron/8 dropped 4 percent of packets.
The results also were impressive with 24 ports. In fact, the Extreme, Foundry, and Packet Engines switches were perfect, routing nearly 36 million IP packets without dropping one. These numbers are extremely encouraging when put in the context of current routing capabilities; even the largest conventional routers today move traffic at aggregate rates well below 1 million pps. In other words, network architects who are looking to strengthen their backbone networks need look no further than these devices.
Wide View
Our final Layer 3 test involved routing packets to any IP address, not just those on the corporate campus. Of course, this is a job usually handled by the WAN router connecting the campus to an ISP (Internet service provider), but Bay, Foundry, and Packet Engines market their boxes for use in ISP sites. And that made the test quite relevant.
We used a modified version of the so-called Torrent test, created by router vendor Torrent Networking Technologies Inc. (Silver Spring, Md.) and Netcom Systems. The original test offers more than 1 million unique IP addresses to the switch, a figure that's far too high to be meaningful for corporate campuses. Users and vendors told us that campus routers might handle hundreds or maybe thousands of arbitrary lookups at a time, but no higher. We reduced the size of the test so that we'd offer just 4,000 unique IP addresses, and if a switch could successfully forward these we'd increase the load to 12,000. For both loads, we offered all addresses at wire speed to one switch port and sought to have them forwarded to four outbound ports. We measured addresses forwarded, and considered each packet delivered to be an IP address successfully learned.
Switches from Bay, Foundry, and Packet Engines handled both of the loads with ease. They all learned all addresses without packet loss-except for Bay's Accelar 1200, which dropped an insignificant 0.78 percent of offered addresses.
It was a different story for Extreme's Black Diamond. The vendor's architecture routes packets to known addresses at wire speed, but packets with unknown IP destination addresses get sent to a management module. The software-based processing that results takes far longer than simply forwarding the packet, which is done in silicon. As a result, the Black Diamond learned only 1.46 percent of IP addresses at wire speed, and the switch didn't learn all addresses until we reduced the offered load to less than 1 percent. This shouldn't be taken as a knock. Extreme says its products are intended as LAN switches, not ISP backbone devices. On corporate campuses, IP addresses are already known-and thus arbitrary address lookups just aren't an issue.
-David Newman is senior technology editor for Data Comm. His e-mail address is dnewman@data.com. Tadesse Giorgis is a senior test engineer at NSTL Inc. (Conshohocken, Pa.). His e-mail address is tadesse@nstl.com. Farhad Yavari-Issalou is a project manager at NSTL. He can be reached via e-mail at farhad@nstl.com.
---
Thanks
Data Comm gratefully acknowledges the support of Netcom Systems Inc. (Chatsworth, Calif.), which supplied its Smarbits analyzers with 24 of its gigabit Ethernet line cards and 32 multilayer 10/100 line cards; AMP Inc. (Harrisburg, Pa.), which supplied multimode fiber cabling; and Extreme Networks Inc. (Cupertino, Calif.), which supplied a Summit4 switch for prototyping of this test.
---
Sidebar-
TOP PERFORMERS
-Foundry Networks: High performance and low prices are the hallmarks of the chassis-based Bigiron 4000, which learned more MAC addresses than any other product tested, aced the Layer 2 and 3 stress tests, and is far less expensive than the other 24-port configurations we tested.
-Packet Engines: The Powerrail 5200 delivered letter-perfect results in our Layer 2 and 3 forwarding-rate tests. It also boasts the most gigabit Ethernet ports per chassis, IP and IPX routing, and extensive QOS capabilities.
---
Sidebar-
LAB TEST VENDOR PARTICIPANTS
Bay Networks
The Accelar 1200 has excellent Layer 2 and Layer 3 address learning capabilities, first-rate VLAN support, extensive management features-and a performance problem when traffic rates rise to extreme levels. In our stress tests, the Accelar dropped up to 50 percent of Layer 2 and 3 packets. Bay says packet loss isn't a problem in production networks, where traffic rates are much lower over time.
Extreme Networks
Extreme's already impressive lineup of reasonably priced, unreasonably fast switches now has a chassis-based entry with the Black Diamond 6800, which boasts up to 48 gigabit Ethernet interfaces. While the beta version aced all our Layer 2 and 3 stress tests, there were a few rough edges: The switch learned only 4,700 MAC addresses, far short of the record 131,000 addresses learned by an Extreme switch in an earlier test, and it did so at a relatively low rate. The vendor was still at work on the switch's beta code at the time we tested and says the production release should turn in higher performance numbers.
Foundry Networks
Both the chassis-based Bigiron 4000 and fixed-configuration Turboiron/8 put up impressive numbers. The Bigiron is not only the least expensive of the 24-port gigabit Ethernet switches tested, it also made perfect scores in all our Layer 2 and 3 stress tests and learned more MAC addresses than any other product we looked at. The Turboiron/8 was nearly as good, showing only minor packet loss in one of our Layer 3 tests but posting perfect results everywhere else.
Packet Engines
The chassis-based Powerrail 5200 delivered terrific overall results: It aced all of our Layer 2 and 3 forwarding rate tests, moving up to 36 million packets per second without dropping a single one. It's also the only product tested that supports ATM, FDDI, and packet-over-Sonet interfaces in addition to gigabit Ethernet-and it also offers multiprotocol routing and several QOS mechanisms. It also can control the number of MAC addresses sent to all switch ports, an important consideration in devices with high port density. |
